Law Society Logo 

eLaw - Business Law Update

March 2014 - No. 62
ISSN 1916-3908
In This Issue
Supreme Court Clarifies Tort of Causing Loss by Unlawful Means
Utilization of MTS Pension Surplus to be Negotiated: SCC
Copyright Clarity: SCC
Leave to Appeal Granted re CCAA Holdback Order: MBCA
Sole Director's Improper Act Warrants Piercing of Corporate Veil: ONCA
Legislative Update
More on Anti-Spam Law
Consultation on Potential Amendments to the Canada Business Corporations Act
Year in Review Articles
Recommended Reading
Federal and Manitoba 2014 Budget Highlights
Facta
Spring CPD: LSM
Upcoming Conferences: CBA

Supreme Court Clarifies Tort of Causing Loss by Unlawful Means

 

In A.I. Enterprises Ltd. v. Bram Enterprises Ltd., 2014 SCC 12, the Supreme Court found no liability for the tort of causing loss by unlawful means on the part of a family member whose actions in thwarting the sale of a family owned apartment building to outsiders caused a $400,000 loss, since his conduct would not have been actionable by the third party had the third party suffered the loss. The decision clarifies the scope of the tort of unlawful interference with economic relations, which the court said should be kept within narrow bounds. The court upheld the finding of the trial judge that the dissenting member was otherwise liable, however, for breaching his fiduciary duty as a director and sole shareholder of the company which managed the family's rental buildings.

Utilization of MTS Pension Surplus to be Negotiated: SCC

 

The "new" MTS employee pension plan (put in place when MTS was privatized in 1997) contravened the Act and memorandum of agreement governing the privatization according to the Supreme Court in Telecommunications Employees Association of Manitoba Inc. v. Manitoba Telecom Services Inc., 2014 SCC 11, by violating the s.15(2) requirement that any new plan must provide equivalent "value" (which the court interpreted to include both in the benefits paid to plan members and in the funding mechanism used to produce the benefits). The 43 million dollar plan surplus, which had been funded solely by employees, was no longer accessible to members under the new plan, and this violated the equivalency requirement. The court reinstated the trial judge's remedial order for the parties to negotiate utilization of the funds and arrive at a mutually agreeable implementation process.

Copyright Clarity: SCC

 

In Cinar Corporation v. Robinson, 2013 SCC 73, an important decision for copyright lawyers and artists, the Supreme Court affirmed the trial judge's finding that the producers of a children's animated television series infringed the copyright of an artist who had earlier tried to sell them his ideas for a similar show. The court awarded both pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, punitive damages, and solicitors' costs to the beleaguered plaintiff. In his article, Robinson v. Cinar in the Supreme Court, Barry Sookman describes the decision as "a goldmine - a treasure trove - of important copyright holdings by the Supreme Court." The Court has published two posts on the decision:Substantial Protection for Substantial Infringement - Part I and Part II.

Leave to Appeal Granted re CCAA Holdback Order: MBCA

 

Although special deference is normally accorded to decisions of CCAA judges and leave to appeal is granted sparingly, the court in Puratone et al., Re, 2014 MBCA 13, granted leave to two secured creditors to appeal the supervising judge's order holding back almost a million dollars from the general holdback monies in a CCAA proceeding and dedicating them to an unproved and unsecured claim (which was to proceed following the lifting of the stay of proceedings order by the same judge). The secured creditors argued, among other things, that the practical effect of the holdback order was to elevate the unproven, unsecured claim ahead of their secured claims and that this improper reordering of priorities in the CCAA proceedings was a point of some significance to CCAA practice. The judge agreed that the leave application raised a question of importance to the practice and was satisfied that it was neither frivolous nor likely to hinder progress in the CCAA proceeding.

Sole Director's Improper Act Warrants Piercing of Corporate Veil: ONCA

 

The court has inherent discretion to pierce the corporate veil where appropriate according to the Ontario Court of Appeal in Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. v. 6470360 Canada Inc. (Energyshop Consulting Inc./Powerhouse Energy Management Inc.), 2014 ONCA 85. In this case, the court pierced the corporate veil to find the sole director and controlling mind of a corporation personally liable for the money misappropriated by his corporation, since he had signing authority over the accounts and authorised the transfer of significant amounts of money. The Canadian Appeals Monitor blog post, Piercing The Corporate Veil May Be Easier Than You Think, discusses the decision.

Legislative Update

 

The Securities Amendment Act (except ss. 1, 40, 44, 49 (c) and 53) was proclaimed in force December 31, 2013. The amendments allow the Manitoba Securities Commission to regulate over-the-counter derivatives, trading, clearing agencies, and trade repositories. Along with Ontario and Quebec, Manitoba has published proposed rules (MSC Rule 25-503) to regulate clearing agencies. MSC Notice 2013-49 explains the transitional matters relating to the regulation of derivatives under the amended act.

 

Bill 46 received royal assent on December 5, 2013, appealing The Charities Endorsement Act effective December 31, 2013 and ending provincial regulation of charitable fundraising. Charities previously required to apply for authorization to solicit funds will no longer have to do so. Of course Manitoba charities are still subject to CRA regulation under the Income Tax Act. The blog posts Fundraising Regulation and The New Canada Not-For-Profit Corporations Act contain some good advice for those advising charities and not-for-profit corporations that are registered Canadian charities.

 

Bill 17,The Consumer Protection Amendment and Business Practices Amendment Act (Motor Vehicle Advertising and Information Disclosure and Other Amendments, received royal assent on December 5, 2013, adding new motor vehicle advertising regulation and enforcement provisions to The Consumer Protection Act and eliminating the motor vehicle information disclosure provisions in The Business Practices Act. Among other things, the new provisions address false and misleading advertising by vehicle dealers and require that ads show all-inclusive pricing. These sections will come into force on proclamation. 

More on Anti-Spam Law

 

Reaction to the news that Canada's long anticipated anti-spam legislation will come into force July 1, 2014 continues to dominate the legal blogosphere. Some recent helpful additions:

Consultation on Potential Amendments to the Canada Business  Corporations Act

 

Industry Canada is conducting public consultations on a full range of CBCA corporate governance matters with a view to amending the Act to ensure the effectiveness of its governance framework. The issues under review are described in the Industry Canada discussion paper and in this Stikeman Elliott blog post. Interested parties are invited to submit their comments no later than May 15, 2014.

Year in Review Articles

 

Something about the start of a new year causes us to reflect on what has passed and offer predictions for the future. Here are links to some of this year's best articles arising from that impulse:

Recommended Reading

 

The February 2014 edition of the CBA's Practice Link bulletin contains articles on navigating the business of law and a CBCA update.

 

If your business clients are seeking advice on whether to accept bitcoin as payment you'll want to read the following articles which examine the legal and practical implications of the unregulated currency: Legal Implications Of Accepting Bitcoin As Payment and Bitcoin E-Gold Rush: Unregulated Technology Gains Currency.

 

Banking for Federalism: SCC to hear Appeal in Bank of Montreal (BMO) v. Marcotte - this article from The Court discusses a trilogy of banking cases soon to be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada which the author argues have the potential to shape the future of federalism.

 

The cross-border perspective: name changes and other post-filing or registration events under the UCC and the PPSA - this blog post by an American lawyer discusses some of the differences between Canadian and US law on personal property security interests. The blog is a good resource for Canadian lawyers representing businesses with interests in the United States.

Federal and Manitoba 2014 Budget Highlights

 

Highlights of the recent federal and Manitoba budgets can be found in the following articles:

Facta

 

The Canadian government announced it has signed a tax information sharing intergovernmental agreement with the United States regarding its Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. The agreement would relieve Canadian financial institutions from the requirement to share information on certain accounts held by US taxpayers with the IRS, which was to take effect July 1, 2014. Under the agreement, financial institutions would instead be required to report that information to the Canada Revenue Agency. Legislation has been introduced to ratify the agreement. This blog post contains Moody Gartner's submission to the Department of Finance, outlining its concerns with the agreement.  

Spring CPD: LSM

 

New Manitoba Private Sector Privacy Legislation (Bill 211) - On September 13, 2013, Bill 211, The Personal Information Protection and Identity Theft Prevention Act (PIPITPA) received royal assent, making Manitoba the fourth Canadian province to enact general private sector privacy protection legislation. Subject to specified exemptions, Bill 211 will apply to all organizations that operate in Manitoba and that collect, use and disclose personal information (including personal employee information). Join privacy law expert Brian Bowman at this webinar presentation on March 27, 2014, for a practical discussion of what you need to know about the new regime.

 

Things you Need to Know About Wrongful Dismissal - Join Robin Kersey and Jeff Palamar for a lively webinar discussion on what you need to know to advise employers and employees in wrongful dismissal cases. The webinar takes place from 12:00 noon to 1:00 p.m. on April 8, 2014. Discounts are available for group registrants.

Upcoming Conferences: CBA

 

Conference season is approaching fast. Options which may interest business lawyers include:

  • The 2014 National Charity Law Symposium will be presented live at the Toronto Board of Trade and online on May 23, 2014.
The Law Society of Manitoba provides this service solely for the benefit of and to support the competence of its members.  Members should exercise their professional judgment in using or adapting any content.