Fashioning a Fit Remedy
for Oppressive Conduct a Fact-Dependent Exercise: SCC
The Supreme Court clarifies the test for personal liability of
directors for oppressive conduct in Wilson v. Alharayeri, 2017 SCC 39,
reaffirming the breadth of s. 241(3) of the CBCA and the court’s power
to fashion an appropriate remedy. The court endorsed the two-pronged
approach to personal liability outlined in the 20-year old Budd
decision, and went on to articulate four principles to serve as
guideposts informing the flexible and discretionary approach the courts
have adopted to orders under s. 241(3) (see paras. 47-57). Here are
some of the many commentaries on the decision:
|
Promise Doctrine
Unsound and Incongruent with the Patent Act: SCC
Applying the promise
doctrine “is not the correct approach to determine whether a patent has
sufficient utility,” according to the Supreme Court in AstraZeneca
Canada Inc. v. Apotex Inc., 2017 SCC 36. The court set aside lower
court decisions holding AstraZeneca’s NEXIUM patent invalid for want of
utility because, applying the promise doctrine, “it promised more than
it could provide.” The court found that the promise doctrine is
“excessively onerous in two ways: (1) it determines the standard of
utility that is required of a patent by reference to the promises
expressed in the patent; and (2) where there are multiple expressed
promises of utility, it requires that all be fulfilled for a patent to
be valid.” (para. 37) “(T)o deprive…an invention of patent
protection if even one “promised” use is not soundly predicted or
demonstrated is punitive and has no basis in the Act,” according to the
court. To determine whether a patent discloses an invention with
sufficient utility under s. 2, courts must first identify the
subject-matter of the invention as claimed in the patent, and second,
ask whether that subject-matter is useful — is it capable of a
practical purpose (i.e. an actual result). Even “a scintilla of utility
will do.” (para. 55). These articles discuss the decision:
|
“The Internet Has No
Borders”: SCC
A 7-2 majority of the Supreme Court upheld a worldwide interlocutory
injunction against Google (ordering it to globally de‑index certain
websites used to unlawfully sell the intellectual property of another
company) in Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc., 2017 SCC 34. Google
argued, among other things, that, as a non-party, it should be immune
from the injunction; that a global injunction violates international
comity; and that freedom of expression concerns should have tipped the
balance against granting the order. The court found that the first two
arguments contradict existing jurisprudence and that “while it is
always important to pay respectful attention to freedom of expression
concerns, particularly when dealing with the core values of another
country, I do not see freedom of expression issues being engaged in any
way that tips the balance of convenience towards Google in this case.”
(para. 45)
These articles discuss the decision:
|
Awards in Highly
Contested Private Commercial Arbitration Stand: MBCA
The Court of Appeal
dismissed two applications for leave to appeal and a motion to stay a
commercial arbitrator’s order liquidating farmland owned by two
long-disputing corporations in Wolfe et al v Taylor et al; Fat Cat
Farms Ltd et al v Wolfe et al, 2017 MBCA 74. Among other things, the
appellants argued that the arbitrator did not follow the procedures set
out in the parties’ mediation agreement and therefore did not have the
jurisdiction to decide that the shotgun period had expired or to make
the liquidation order. The court disagreed, finding that there were no
procedural issues raised by the arbitrator’s interpretation of the
mediation agreement and that the application judge did not err in
relying on the wrong standard of review in concluding that the
arbitrator had jurisdiction. The court also found that the appellants
had not demonstrated the necessary public interest criteria, nor shown
that an injustice would occur if leave was denied. |
Directors Personally
Liable for Tax Debt Incurred Under Former Directors: MBQB
In Salisbury House of
Canada Ltd. et al. v. Manitoba (Deputy Minister of Finance), 2017 MBQB
151, the directors of Salisbury House were unsuccessful in their
application to rescind a series of tax assessments issued against them
personally under The Tax Administration and Miscellaneous Taxes Act and
confirmed by the Tax Appeals Commission. The directors argued that they
should not be personally liable for the misdeeds of the former
directors of the corporation given their ignorance as to the true
financial picture of the company at the time they were elected. The
court rejected their argument that the Commission had erred in applying
the due diligence defence set out in s. 43(2) of the Act, finding no
evidence that the directors did anything to “prevent the corporation’s
failure to pay or remit tax” as required. The court also rejected the
directors’ arguments that the Commission misinterpreted the meaning of
s. 43(1) of the Act (concerning when the taxes were “due”); and that
they were denied natural justice in not being allowed to adduce all
relevant evidence in the Commission proceedings.
|
Family Businesses,
Estate Planning and the Oppression Remedy: MBQB
In Glesby v. Glesby et al., 2017
MBQB 133, a son whose equity interest as a shareholder in a family held
corporation was decimated following a corporate reorganization (in
which he declined to participate), was successful in his claim that his
father and the corporation contravened both s. 234(2) and s. 117(1)(a)
of The Corporations Act. The court found that the since deceased father
violated the oppression and duty of care provisions of the Act by
taking an unjustified management salary, using his power as the sole
controlling officer to strip the corporation of all equity, and
breaching his duty as a trustee of the son’s shares. The court ordered
the estate to repay the $2,293,963 management salary to the
corporation, removed the other family members as directors, and
appointed the son as sole director and officer.
|
Legislative Update
Federal
Bill C-25, An Act to amend the Canada Business Corporations Act, the
Canada Cooperatives Act, the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act,
and the Competition Act, passed third reading in the House of Commons
June 21, 2017. It proposes significant changes to corporate governance,
shareholder participation, and gender diversity for issuers
incorporated under the CBCA. For further details see the legislative
summary, and these articles and blog posts from
Canadian Lawyer, Blakes, BLG, Dentons, Fasken Martineau, Norton
Rose Fulbright, and Osler.
Proposed regulations to Bill C-25, fleshing out the details of the
changes to corporate law, were published December 14, 2016. They are
discussed in blog posts from McCarthy Tetrault, Torys LLP and Blakes,
and in this article from the CBA: CBA welcomes diversity measures in
Bill C-25.
Bill C-30, Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade
Agreement Implementation Act, received royal assent May 16, 2017 and
Bill C-31, An Act to implement the Free Trade Agreement between Canada
and Ukraine, received royal assent June 1, 2017. These bills implement
recently negotiated trade agreements. The legislative summaries provide
further details.
Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act and other Acts
respecting transportation and to make related and consequential
amendments to other Acts, received second reading and was referred to
committee on June 19, 2017. It aims to modernize transportation laws in
Canada, improving freight rail safety and efficiency; liberalizing
international ownership restrictions for Canadian air carriers; and
establishing new air passenger rights. For further information see the
legislative summary, departmental information, and Transportation 2030
strategic plan.
Provincial
Bill 2, The Securities Amendment Act, received royal
assent and came into force June 2, 2017. As detailed in the explanatory
note, it amends The Securities Act to provide for the automatic
enforcement of sanctions, conditions, restrictions or requirements
imposed by other securities regulators when there has been a finding or
admission of a breach of securities laws or acts contrary to the public
interest.
Bill 3, The Pooled Registered Pension Plans (Manitoba) Act, received
royal assent June 2, 2017 and will come into force on proclamation. It
provides the legal framework for certain pooled pension plans to be
open to employees and self-employed persons in Manitoba. See the
explanatory note for further detail.
Bill 7, The New West Partnership Trade Agreement Implementation Act
(Various Acts Amended), received royal assent and came into force June
2, 2017. It amends three Acts so that Manitoba can join the above trade
agreement, as well as participate in other future domestic trade
agreements. Further details can be found in the explanatory note to the
bill.
Bill 25, The Cannabis Harm Prevention Act (Various Acts Amended),
received royal assent and came into force in part on June 2, 2017.
Parts 2, 3, 5 and 6 will come into force on proclamation. It proposes
amendments to several Acts to address health or safety concerns that
will arise when cannabis consumption is no longer illegal (July 2018).
For further information see the explanatory note.
Bill 30, The Local Vehicles for Hire Act, was introduced March 20,
2017. It would repeal The Taxicab Act and allow municipalities to make
by-laws regulating the entire vehicle-for-hire industry. Further
details can be found in the explanatory note to the bill and in this
government news release.
|
Canadian Securities
Administrators Update
The CSA released the following staff notices this summer:
Staff Notice 31-103 and 33-109 Amendments to National Instrument 31-103
Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant
Obligations, National Instrument 33-109 Registration Information and
their respective Companion Policies – concerning the adoption of
amendments to the current regulatory framework for dealers, advisers
and investment fund managers, originally proposed in July of 2016;
Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders
in Special Transactions -concerning procedural safeguards intended to
mitigate the risks to minority security holders in material conflict of
interest transactions;
Staff Notice 46-307 – Cryptocurrency Offerings – providing guidance
with respect to the applicability of securities laws to cryptocurrency
exchanges, offerings, and investment funds.
For commentary on the notices see:
|
Changes Proposed to the
Voluntary Disclosures Program
Consultation on
Proposed Changes to Private Corporation Tax Planning
The Department of Finance released its consultation document, Tax
Planning Using Private Corporations, on July 18, 2017. The paper
outlines proposed changes to private corporation and family trust tax
planning, including three issues outlined in Budget 2017: income
sprinkling, passive investment portfolios, and converting income into
capital gains. The government invites comments on the proposals until
October 2, 2017. The proposed changes will have a significant impact on
private businesses in Canada, as outlined in these TDS LLP, MLT Aikins,
and McCarthy Tétrault LLP articles. |
Recommended Reading
2017 Isaac Pitblado Lectures
The 2017 Isaac Pitblado Lectures, #140Down – Now What? The Future of Lawyering is Here,
will be held November 3, 2017 (the one day format is new this year) at
the Grand Ballroom, Fort Garry Place. The lectures will explore the
future of the legal profession, examining such topics as the future of
adjudication, client centred service, and the role of technology in
practice. The early bird discount ends September 29, 2017, so register soon to reserve your spot! Registrants will also receive a copy of Keynote Speaker - Jordan Furlong's 2017 book, Law is a Buyer's Market: Building a Client First Law Firm. Follow us on twitter @pitbladolecture for the most up-to-date information.
|
Fall CPD: LSM
Hot Topics in Wills and Estates
- Presenters Eleanor Wiebe, Q.C. and Caroline Kiva will address a wide
range of topics at this upcoming half-day program, including the Rule
74 amendments, estate planning issues with US vacation property, powers
of attorney, and recent case law. The program will be held in Winnipeg
on September 26 (9:00 to noon) and in Brandon on October 4 (1:00 to
4:00 pm). Registrants will receive a copy of the 2d edition of Drafting Wills in Canada: A Lawyer’s Practical Guide.
Land Titles eRegistration & Electronic Funds Transfer -
the new Land Titles eRegistration system will be open for use on
December 17, 2017 and mandatory for all lawyers to use as of April 3,
2018. This education session will provide training on how to register
documents electronically; the new Law Society Rules on electronic funds
transfers; and what firms need to do to be ready to use the new system.
One session will be held September 18, 2017 in Brandon and three
half-day sessions will be held in the Law Society classroom in Winnipeg
(Sept 27, Oct 2 and 5, 2017).
Utmost Good Faith: Yesterday and Today - the legal principles (duty to disclose and utmost good faith) outlined 250 years ago in Carter v Boehm
remain relevant today, even beyond their original insurance law
context. Len French will discuss how the case has been applied over the
years and its implications for general contract law at this November 8,
2017 lunch program. Students and webinar participants are eligible for registration discounts.
|
MBA Programs
Upcoming Conferences
The CBA’s 13th annual National Insolvency Law Conference
will be held September 14-15, 2017, in St. John's, Newfoundland and
Labrador. Presenters will cover a wide range of topics from
investigating and litigating fraud to the world of offshore financial
centre insolvency and the latest Canadian case law. For further details
see the conference agenda.
The CBA Competition Law Fall Conference
will be held October 26-27, 2017, in Ottawa, Ontario. Presenters will
share their knowledge and advice on critical and emerging competition
law issues in a variety of areas including mergers, abuse, conspiracy,
deceptive marketing, class actions and compliance. Register online or
by completing this form.
The 8th annual CBA Access to Information and Privacy Law Symposium
will be held October 27-28, 2017, in Ottawa, Ontario. Topics to be
considered include: CASL and the right of private
action; PIPEDA legislative reform;
changes to US privacy laws; and the internet of things. See the conference agenda for further details.
The CBA will hold its first National Business Law Conference, The Future of M&A Transactions: Current Trends in an Evolving Practice, on November 2-3, 2017, in Toronto. Register online or by completing and faxing this pdf registration form.
Beyond Borders: Business and Law in the Global Village
– registration is now open for the 2018 CCCA National Conference and
ICW Summit, which will take place April 29 - May 1, 2018, in Toronto.
|
ISSN 1916-3916
|