Law Society Logo 

eLaw - Family Law Update

November 2013 - No. 65
ISSN 1916-3924
In This Issue
Bankruptcy Discharge Set Aside to Allow Equalization Claim Against Exempt Farm Property: MBQB
"Fit and Just" Custody Variations: MBQB
Sealing Orders on Child Protection Agency Records: MBQB
Case Conference System Under Review
Promoting Access to Justice
Family Law Publications
Pitblado Lectures
Collaborative Divorce and Conflict Resolution Training: CPM

Bankruptcy Discharge Set Aside to Allow Equalization Claim Against Exempt Farm Property: MBQB

 

The clearly inequitable outcome in Schreyer v. Schreyer, 2011 SCC 35 (the Manitoba case in which a wife's equalization claim was extinguished by her husband's discharge from bankruptcy leaving her no remedy against the exempt farm property) has been redressed in Bankruptcy of Anthony Leonard Schreyer, 2013 MBQB 179. The court granted the wife's motion to rescind the original discharge pursuant to s. 187(5) of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act and leave to continue her equalization claim with respect to the exempt property pursuant to s. 69.4. The court dismissed the husband's argument of undue delay, pointing out that the equities were all in the wife's favour considering the husband's conduct in misleading the trustee and the way in which the wife "was led through a long and expensive court process" with the husband's consent and "the approbation of the court, only to find out that she could not pursue the equalization claim." The court commented on the underappreciated nuances of bankruptcy law and how it can impact family proceedings as follows:

 

It is indeed unfortunate that the principles of bankruptcy law and family law continue to be at cross-purposes. In addition it is an unfortunate reality that lawyers practising family law tend to be unaware of the potential implications of bankruptcy legislation as it from time to time impacts family law proceedings, and some judges including those who specialize in family law matters are also unfamiliar with the bankruptcy legislation...

"Fit and Just" Custody Variations: MBQB

 

Two recent family division decisions consider what circumstances make it "fit and just" to vary custody orders. In both cases the court identified the passage of significant time (6 years) as a factor justifying a review of the parenting schedule and whether it met the child's current needs and best interests. In Coyle v. Welch, 2013 MBQB 212 the court granted the father's motion to vary a shared parenting order (that the uncooperative and verbally abusive mother was not respecting) to a specified week on/week off schedule. The court also ordered an adjustment to the father's child support obligation to reflect the equal time adjustment and s. 9 of the Child Support Guidelines Regulation.

 

In T.A.F. v. M.W.B., 2013 MBQB 213 the court increased the father's access but continued the requirement that it be supervised as "a temporary and time-limited measure" until the father completes psychological counselling addressing his parenting deficiencies.

Sealing Orders on Child Protection Agency Records: MBQB

 

The court canvasses the law concerning sealing orders and child protection agency records in family court proceedings in DiMartino v. DiMartino, 2013 MBQB 206. After weighing the constitutional right to open courts against the competing public interest in protecting the confidentiality of child and family services records the court concluded that, in family court proceedings, the benefit of not permitting disclosure of records "almost invariably" outweighs the potential negative impact upon access to the courts. The court made the interim sealing order permanent, subject to a media exception in keeping with s. 75 of the CFSA

Case Conference System Under Review

 

Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench judges have established a committee to look at ways to improve the case conference system, including a review of the Case Management Information Statement form (Form 70S.1 and 70S.2).

Promoting Access to Justice

 

The Action Committee on Access to Civil and Family Justice released its final report A Roadmap for Change this month.The report promotes a broad understanding of the access to justice problem facing our civil and family justice system, identifies a new way of thinking to guide reform, and provides an access to justice roadmap for real improvement. (page 1)

 

And, Toronto family lawyer Andrew Feldstein has published the first of 6 white papers on the need for immediate change in our family law system on his website It's Time for Justice.

Family Law Publications

 

The Department of Justice Canada has recently released two new publications for separating parents: Making Plans, a guide to help parents put their children first when making parenting arrangements, and Parenting Plan Tool, a summary of what should go into a parenting plan.

 

Reforging the bonds - this Lawyers Weekly article discusses the broad powers of courts to impose sanctions against parents who engage in parental alienation and a recent Ontario case, Valettes v. Chrissanthakoupoulos, 2013 ONSC 4936, in which the judge took a tough stance against a mother who discontinued the reunification therapy ordered by the court.

Hoodwinked! - this Canadian Lawyer cover story looks at the perils of hiring private investigators for financial investigations in family law cases.

 The October 2013 edition of The Family Way, the CBA National Family Law section newsletter, contains several articles that may be of interest to family law lawyers, including a summary of the results of the section survey on enforcement of orders for access and a discussion of a recent Quebec Court of Appeal decision on unmarried partners and unjust enrichment.

Pitblado Lectures

 

The 2013 Isaac Pitblado Lectures, Human Rights Challenges and Achievements, will take place November 22-23, 2013, at the Fort Garry Hotel. Presenters will cover a variety of topical human rights issues including equality jurisprudence, the future of human rights tribunals and commissions, and how international human rights law impacts Manitoba practice.

Family Law Section Program: MBA

 

The Family Law section of the Manitoba Bar Association is presenting the program Relocation - To Move or Not to Move?? on November 1, 2013, from 1:00 to 3:00 p.m. in the Law Society classroom. Queen's University professor Nicholas Bala, a national and international expert on relocation, will discuss the research, case law, trends, and proposals for reform on this issue. Professor Bala is part of a Manitoba working group considering legislative changes in this area.

Collaborative Divorce and Conflict Resolution Training: CPM

 

Collaborative Practice Manitoba is presenting an all-day training program on Comprehensive Collaborative Divorce and Conflict Resolution on November 29, 2013. Presenters Anu Osborne and Judy Haid will focus on integrating conflict resolution into the collaborative practice model and will provide participants the opportunity to apply their skills to a case. Contact info@collaborativepracticemanitoba.ca for further information.

The Law Society of Manitoba provides this service solely for the benefit of and to support the competence of its members.  Members should exercise their professional judgment in using or adapting any content.