Jumping to Termination Precipitous: MB LA
In International
Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing
Ironworkers, Local Union 728 v BBE Hydro Constructors Lp, 2017
CanLII 19178 (MB LA), the arbitrator ordered the reinstatement of two
foremen fired for gross negligence for a production error which
necessitated major re-work on a hydro project, finding it was
precipitous of the employer to jump to termination where the employees
were contrite in their evidence, accepted responsibility for the error,
and had no disciplinary record. While the employees’ conduct was a
dereliction of duty, it was not so sufficiently severe as to cause an
irreparable breach of the employment relationship, according to the
arbitrator, and termination was an excessive response to the
misconduct. A written warning was substituted.
|
Consolidation Should Enhance Stability: MB LB
The Labour Board was not satisfied that the consolidation
of two bargaining units of employees of a local theatre company into a
single unit would enhance labour relations stability without creating
labour relations problems for the parties, and rejected the applicant
union’s request to merge in International
Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians,
Artists and Allied Crafts of The United States, its Territories and
Canada (IATSE), Local 63 v Prairie Theatre Exchange, 2017 CanLII
13014 (MB LB). The first unit was certified for supervisory stage hand
employees and the second, later-certified, unit was for casual stage
hand employees. The board found that in circumstances where the history
of collective bargaining between the parties indicated that the
configuration of bargaining units had established a bargaining
structure that had worked adequately for some years, the party
attempting to alter the status quo must present compelling reasons to
show why consolidation of bargaining units is appropriate. In this
case, where there was a history of productive collective bargaining in
both units (including multiple renewals without issues, no grievances
and minimal bargaining sessions), there was no evidence of any
significant and material change that would justify consolidating,
especially where there were some notable differences in the collective
agreements.
|
Employment and Labour Law Cases at the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court heard the appeal of Canada (Attorney General) v. Association of Justice Counsel,
2016 FCA 92, on April 19, 2017, and reserved judgment. Government
immigration lawyers from Quebec appealed the Federal Court of Appeal
decision overturning an adjudicator’s finding that a policy requiring
them to be on mandatory unpaid standby to respond to or present stay
applications outside of work hours infringed both their collective
agreement and s.7 of the Charter. This Law Times article discusses the FCA decision and how it may have broader employment law implications.
The court also reserved judgment after hearing the appeal of Schrenk v. British Columbia (Human Rights Tribunal),
2016 BCCA 146, on March 28, 2017. This case “raises very important
issues as to who is entitled to protections against harassment and
discrimination in the workplace and in what workplace settings and
employment-related relationship,” according to the author of the
article A Schrenk Explainer: The case before the Supreme Court of Canada and why it matters, from the Rubin Thomlinson blog.
|
Federal Budget 2017: Employment Law Changes
Legislative Update
Federal
Bill C-4, An
Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and
Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the
Income Tax Act, is in third reading at the Senate. It repeals
the amendments previously brought by the former government in bills
C-525 and C-377 (making union certification more difficult and
requiring unions to track their spending, among other things).
C-5, Economic Action Plan 2015 Act, No. 1, is still before the House of Commons at second reading. It repeals Division 20 of Part 3 of the Economic Action Plan 2015 Act, No. 1
(Bill C-59), which authorizes the government to unilaterally override
the collective bargaining process and impose a new sick leave system on
the public service.
C-7, An Act to amend the Public Service Labour Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and other Acts and to provide for certain other measures, passed third reading in the Senate with amendments last June. It amends the Public Service Labour Relations Act to provide for a labour relations regime for members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and reservists.
Bill C-16, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code,
was referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and
Constitutional Affairs on March 2, 2017. It proposes amendments to the Canadian Human Rights Act to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination and to the Criminal Code
to extend the protection against hate propaganda to any section of the
public that is distinguished by gender identity or expression and to
affect sentencing on such crimes. For further information see the legislative summary, departmental information, and the Slaw article Gender Identity and Gender Expression Protection Under the Law.
S-201, the Genetic Non-Discrimination Act, has passed with amendments in both houses, and is awaiting proclamation by royal assent. The government has indicated,
however, that it will ask the Supreme Court for an opinion on the
constitutionality of the Act. It prohibits any person from
requiring an individual to undergo a genetic test or disclose the
results of a genetic test as a condition of providing goods or services
to, entering into or continuing a contract or agreement with, or
offering specific conditions in a contract or agreement with, the
individual. Specifically it amends the Canada Labour Code
to protect employees from being required to undergo or to disclose the
results of a genetic test, and provides employees with other
protections related to genetic testing and test results. It also amends
the Canadian Human Rights Act to prohibit discrimination on the ground of genetic characteristics. This article discusses the background of the bill and the controversy surrounding its enactment.
Provincial
These employment and labour related bills are currently before the legislature:
Bill 11, The Community Child Care Standards Amendment Act (Staff Qualifications and Training), passed second reading on March 21, 2017. As detailed in the explanatory note, it establishes a new committee to advise on matters related to staff qualifications.
Bill 12, The Teachers’ Pensions Amendment Act, passed second reading on March 21, 2017. Its main purpose is to update provisions of The Teachers' Pensions Act for consistency with changes to The Pension Benefits Act that came into force in 2010. The explanatory note provides more detail on the proposed changes.
Bill 13, The Regulated Health Professions Amendment Act, passed second reading on March 23, 2017. It amends The Regulated Health Professions Act
to allow the minister to exempt a health profession from the statutory
prohibition on the online publication of certain health information
about disciplined members. See the explanatory note for more information.
Bill 28, The Public Services Sustainability Act,
passed second reading April 24, 2017. It establishes a four-year
sustainability period during which the compensation for public sector
employees, and the fee payments to physicians and other health
professionals, may not be increased except by the percentages permitted
by the bill.
Bill 29, The Health Sector Bargaining Unit Review Act,
deals with bargaining units and collective bargaining in Manitoba's
health sector. It passed second reading April 24, 2017.
|
Recommended Reading
Continuing Professional Development: LSM
Women Thriving in the Law with a Grit and Growth Mindset (May 15, 2017, half-day) and Getting and Growing Grit: The Secret to Success
(May 16, 2017, lunch session) – these programs, presented jointly with
the MBA’s Women Lawyers’ Forum, will help attendees to develop and
apply a “grit and growth” mindset to the challenges of legal practice.
New Civil Queen’s Bench Rules: A Focus on Case Management, Proportionality and Expediency
- join Chief Justice Glenn Joyal, Associate Chief Justice Shane
Perlmutter, and Michael Weinstein for an overview of proposed changes
to the QB Rules and the resulting practice changes. This lunch session
takes place on May 24, 2017, from noon to 1:30 pm in the Law Society
classroom.
Webinar: Avoiding Cyber Dangers
– the Law Society is replaying this very practical webinar on June 13,
2017, with a live question period at the end with Law Society
staff. Legal technology and risk management guru Dan Pinnington
will teach you how to protect yourself and your firm from hacked
emails, malware, phishing scams, and other cybercrime vulnerabilities.
Group registrants are eligible for discounts.
Most Often Asked Questions of a Supreme Court Justice
- the Honourable Justices Moldaver and Côté will share answers to the
questions they are most frequently asked and attendees will be able to
ask their own questions at this jointly sponsored lunch program at the
Provencher Room, Hotel Fort Garry. The program takes place from noon to
1:30 pm on June 5, 2017. Final registration numbers must be in by May
25.
|
MBA Programs
Consider bringing a non-member buddy to one of these section meetings:
Canada Labour Code Alternative Dispute Resolution – presenters Kristin Gibson and Richard Deeley will discuss potential ADR in hearings dealing with cases under the Canada Labour Code
which are considered federal undertakings, such as airlines,
interprovincial transportation, and First Nations Bands. The discussion
will include what constitutes a Federal undertaking under the code and
the defences available to employers. The program takes place May 23,
2017, in the 2nd floor conference room, 444 St. Mary Ave.
An Overview of Injunctions and other Extraordinary Remedies
- this session will provide an overview of the options available to
civil litigators to preserve property, personal rights, business
interests and evidence pending trial and how to defend motions for such
relief. It takes place from noon to 1:30 pm on May 19, 2017 at the Law
Society classroom.
|
ISSN 1916-3916
|