|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
The Law Society of Manitoba Professional Education and Competence |  |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
eLaw Property & Succession Update September 2015
In This Issue | The Brokerage Contract as Hunting Licence: SCC | Court Disinclined to Second Guess LVAC Award: MBCA | Decision on Discontinuance of a Non-Conforming Use Final: MBCA | Parkade Design Defect Allegation a Matter for Trial: MBCA | No Reliance on Inadequate Disclosure: MBQB | Cautionary Tale Concerning Joint Retainers and Solicitor-Client Privilege: MBQB | Mortgage Insurance Rules to Change January 2016 | Canadian Bankers Association Mortgage Discharge Contact List | Property Registry Notices | Consultation Report on Presumption of Death Legislation: MLRC | Malpractice Claims Fact Sheets | Recommended Reading | 2015 Isaac Pitblado Lectures | Fall CPD: LSM | MBA/CBA Fall Programs | Fall Programs: STEP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
The Brokerage Contract as Hunting Licence: SCC
|
|
|
Court Disinclined to Second Guess LVAC Award: MBCA
The court dismissed Manitoba’s appeal of a Land Value Appraisal Commission compensation award in Kleysen v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Manitoba, 2015 MBCA 54, rejecting the province’s argument that LVAC failed to properly apply the definition of market value as set out in The Expropriation Act and that its $50,000 per acre expropriation award was unreasonable. Although the court agreed that “(t)he question of return on investment to the property owner is irrelevant to the determination of fair market value, and reference to such irrelevant factors should be avoided in order to avoid confusion as to the basis of the valuation,” in this case they found that LVAC based its decision on factors other than the value-to-owner test and arrived at an award that was “within an acceptable and reasonable range.”
|
|
|
|
Decision on Discontinuance of a Non-Conforming Use Final: MBCA
In Samborski Garden Supplies Ltd. v. MacDonald (Rural Municipality), 2015 MBCA 53, the court rejected the applicant’s argument that it had been severely prejudiced by the dismissal of its appeal on an issue raised by the court (whether a conditional use order lapsed because it was discontinued under s.54 (now s.91) of The Planning Act). The court noted that counsel received notice of the court’s concern prior to the hearing, had an opportunity to address it by written and oral submissions, and did not object to this process at the hearing. In finding that the applicant had not met its heavy burden of establishing special or unusual circumstances to justify a rehearing of the appeal the court concluded:
A motion for a rehearing is not an opportunity, with the benefit of hindsight, to revisit the conduct of an appeal by experienced counsel… To allow a rehearing in such circumstances would too quickly sacrifice the important principle of finality in litigation which is central to the proper administration of justice (para. 24).
|
|
|
|
Parkade Design Defect Allegation a Matter for Trial: MBCA
An architectural firm will have to go to trial to defend a negligence claim following dismissal of their appeal of an order refusing them summary judgment in Winnipeg Condominium Corp. No. 613 v. Concord Projects Ltd. et al., 2015 MBCA 49. The appeal court was not persuaded that the motion judge’s decision concerning the existence of genuine issues for trial was wrong. The motion judge adopted the Master’s reasoning that, given the developing law on liability for pure economic loss, the question of whether the parkade design defect was latent or patent would require a trial on a complete record. The judge also found that expert evidence would be required concerning the foreseeability of the danger arising from the failure to ensure installation of a waterproof membrane in the parkade.
|
|
|
|
No Reliance on Inadequate Disclosure: MBQB
Despite clear evidence that the vendor and real estate agent defendants were “less than forthcoming” in their written and verbal disclosure concerning a known structural defect, the court dismissed the home purchaser’s fraud and negligence claim against them in Tregobov v. Paradis et al., 2015 MBQB 136, for lack of proof of reliance. There was no actionable fraud, said the court, because the plaintiff was aware that foundation work would be required, but did not request a property condition statement and made an unconditional offer to purchase.
|
|
|
|
Cautionary Tale Concerning Joint Retainers and Solicitor-Client Privilege: MBQB
The court ordered production of a solicitor’s notes concerning the drafting of a disputed joint will in Durand v. Durand (Estate of), 2015 MBQB 132, notwithstanding opposition by the surviving client and the solicitor’s assertion that redaction of the joint instructions would render the notes “useless for any purpose.” The court found that there was sufficient ambiguity in the way the will was drafted to bring it within the “Wills Exception” (allowing erosion of solicitor-client privilege in aid of ascertaining the deceased’s intention). With respect to the wife’s argument that her right to claim her privilege trumped the implicit waiver by the testator, the court said:
Since the Wills Exception is directed to disclosure of the deceased client’s instructions to his solicitor, where segregation of instructions is not possible, the Wills Exception should also extend to notes which might encroach on the instructions of the surviving spouse. To suggest otherwise would allow a surviving client to frustrate the clarification of the deceased client’s intentions even though the surviving client must have been aware of them when they met jointly with their solicitor. In my view, both clients to a joint retainer take the risk when they agree to provide joint instructions to one lawyer that their solicitor-client privilege might be lost if one of their privileges succumbs to the Wills Exception. (para. 25)
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Insurance Rules to Change January 2016
|
|
|
Canadian Bankers Association Mortgage Discharge Contact List
The Canadian Bankers Association has issued an updated list of bank officials to contact in the event of mortgage discharge delays.
|
|
|
|
Property Registry Notices
The Property Registry issued a notice regarding document barcode labels on September 15, 2015. The notice describes a new records management process in the Winnipeg Land Titles Office, pursuant to which barcoded labels will be placed on the Registration Details Application form and on each document in the registration series, replacing the current process of handwriting a registration number on the documents.
The registry also announced the appointment of Aimee Warkentin as the new Deputy District Registrar for the WLTO effective August 4, 2015.
|
|
|
|
Consultation Report on Presumption of Death Legislation: MLRC
The Manitoba Law Reform Commission released its consultation report on Improving Manitoba’s Presumption of Death Act in August. It makes twelve provisional recommendations for improving and modernizing Manitoba’s Presumption of Death Act to bring it in line with presumption of death legislation found in other Canadian jurisdictions.
|
|
|
|
Malpractice Claims Fact Sheets
LAWPRO, Ontario’s professional liability insurer, has created malpractice claims fact sheets for wills and estates and real estate lawyers. The sheets identify the main causes of claims against lawyers, offer tips for avoiding claims, and provide links to practicePRO resources. Although the stats collected are from Ontario, the risk management tips apply equally to Manitoba lawyers.
|
|
|
|
Recommended Reading
New estate rules arising from the 2014 federal budget and passed last December will come into effect January 1, 2016, affecting tax rates on spousal trusts and complicating estate planning. These articles discuss the changes in more detail:
New estate rules start Jan. 1: large implications for taxes on trusts, contents of secondary wills – Blaney McMurtry
If you have an alter ego trust or a spousal trust in your will, read on… - Fillmore Riley LLP
The Will as a Planning Tool – this CLE BC Practice Points paper focuses on how to minimize disputes when planning wills for blended families.
Condominium issues are discussed in a number of recent articles, local and otherwise. Here’s a sampling:
What Is A Private Single Family Residence? – this Miller Thomson article discusses Ballingall v Carleton Condominium Corporation No. 111, 2015 ONSC 2484, a recent Ontario decision revisiting the meaning of the term “private single family residence” commonly used in condominium declarations.
Making an Informed Decision - Advice to Buyers of Condominium Units and Condominium Regulation by Municipalities, Aikins Law, and Overhaul of The Condominium Act (Manitoba): What it Means to Buyers and Sellers of Used Condominium Unit, Fillmore Riley LLP - all articles consider how condominium practice has changed with the passing of Manitoba’s new Condominium Act last February.
Caution: All Lien Legislation is Not the Same – this Aikins Law article examines variations in the lien legislation of Manitoba and Ontario.
|
|
|
|
2015 Isaac Pitblado Lectures
The 2015 Isaac Pitblado Lectures, Blackacre to BlackBerry: Redefining Property and Ownership, will explore how changing notions of property and ownership are affecting legal practice in such diverse areas as intellectual property, digital assets, life leases, and testamentary dispositions. The lectures take place November 6-7, 2015, at the Fort Garry Hotel. Register before October 1, 2015 to take advantage of the early bird rate.
|
|
|
|
Fall CPD: LSM
“OMG, They’re Insolvent! What Do We Do Now?” Insolvency and bankruptcy issues can cause complications in many areas of practice, including real estate. Attend this afternoon program on October 22, 2015 to learn about the latest developments in this area from our expert panel.
|
|
|
|
MBA/CBA Fall Programs
|
|
|
Fall Programs: STEP
The Winnipeg branch of the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP) is offering a full slate of educational sessions this year, including programs on Shareholder Agreement Planning (Oct 20), Farm Tax and Succession Planning (Nov 24), and New Philanthropy in Canada (Dec 15). To register, or for information on how to become a member of STEP, check their website.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are receiving this email in accordance with the Law Society's mandate to uphold and protect the public interest in the delivery of legal services with competence, integrity and independence and to further your opportunities to ensure compliance with the mandatory continuing professional development requirements set out in Law Society Rule 2.81.1(8). |
|
|
|
|
|
www.lawsociety.mb.ca/publications/elaw
The Law Society of Manitoba
219 Kennedy St
Winnipeg MB R3C 1S8
|
|
|
|
|
|